C - commendam 中文 - EN166

commendam n.1.(在正式牧師出缺時代理其職務時所享受的)薪俸代領...

In view of the existing mode and condition of the commendam , oblivious property , fortuna , we concluded that the owner of the property which was formulated in the no . 270 in the criminal law - - - - “ another person “ should be individual , therefore it is unconvincing that the object of this crime is the ownership of public or private property 鑒于代為保管物、遺忘物及埋藏物在實際生活中的存在方式和狀況，可以認為，《刑法》第207條所規定的財物所屬人? ? “他人” ，應指個人，因此說本罪的客體是公私財產所有權并不令人信服。
For example , “ in commendam “ should be limited in custodial behaviors which are produced by clientage based on trust ; as for borrower relationships , leasehold relationships , guarantee relationships , spontaneous agency and unjust enrichment , the embezzlement in others “ properties should be solved by civil means 如“代為保管”應僅限于基于信任委托關系產生的保管行為，對于借用關系、租賃關系、擔保關系、無因管理、不當得利而形成的對他人財物的侵占行為由民事手段解決。
commendation
The article put its emphasis on discussing the object of the crime of embezzlement , the characteristic of the objective aspect of crime and means of prosecution , etc . the author considered that the range in commendam include the property held in trust immediately by another person and the property held by the owner himself while illegal action of keeping is an exception 論文重點討論了侵占罪的客體和對象、侵占罪客觀方面的特征以及追訴方式等問題。筆者認為，作為侵占罪的犯罪對象，代為保管物范圍包括經他人主動委托保管的財物和行為人自行保管的他人財物，但非法保管除外。
But there are still great differences in some theoretical problems , such as ranges in commendam , indecisive consistency between oblivious property and lost one , the time limit of refusal to return or refusal to hand in , litigant forms , and in judicial practice , cognizance of non - crime , this - crime , mat - crime and some difficult and complicated cases 但還有一些問題仍存在較大分歧，如“代為保管”的范圍、遺忘物與遺失物是否同一、拒不返還或拒不交出的時間界限、該罪的訴訟形式等理論問題，以及在司法實踐中對一些疑難復雜案件罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的認定問題。
In view of the existing mode and condition of the commendam , oblivious property , fortuna , we concluded that the owner of the property which was formulated in the no . 270 in the criminal law - - - - “ another person “ should be individual , therefore it is unconvincing that the object of this crime is the ownership of public or private property 鑒于代為保管物、遺忘物及埋藏物在實際生活中的存在方式和狀況，可以認為，《刑法》第207條所規定的財物所屬人? ? “他人” ，應指個人，因此說本罪的客體是公私財產所有權并不令人信服。
For example , “ in commendam “ should be limited in custodial behaviors which are produced by clientage based on trust ; as for borrower relationships , leasehold relationships , guarantee relationships , spontaneous agency and unjust enrichment , the embezzlement in others “ properties should be solved by civil means 如“代為保管”應僅限于基于信任委托關系產生的保管行為，對于借用關系、租賃關系、擔保關系、無因管理、不當得利而形成的對他人財物的侵占行為由民事手段解決。